Intentional screen time for children under two years old should be avoided due to potential long-term negative effects on health and quality of life, according to a comprehensive new study. Researchers are calling for urgent investigation into the risks posed by digital devices to infants, highlighting a gap in current policy and guidance.<\/p>\n
The study, described as the most extensive review of existing global research on the topic, warns that screen use in this age group may contribute to a wide range of developmental issues. These include reduced opportunities for parent-child bonding, less time for physical play with peers, and limited language development. Researchers also noted potential implications for increased overstimulation, sleep difficulties, eye health, and childhood obesity. A significant concern is that infants may begin to rely on digital devices for comfort instead of caregivers.<\/p>\n
The review was conducted by the Action on Digital Device Immersive Conditions Team, comprised of researchers from four UK universities: Leeds, Leeds Trinity, Loughborough, and Aston. While the study did not establish direct causal links between screen use and specific developmental conditions, it strongly stated that “no under-twos should receive regular intentional screen time.” The team emphasized that while passive exposure is unavoidable, deliberate use adds risks without clear benefits.<\/p>\n
The research team is urging a reconsideration of current government guidance for under-fives, which currently advises avoiding screen time for under-twos but allows for exceptions in shared activities that encourage bonding, interaction, and conversation. The new study suggests that such caveats may be misinterpreted by parents and caregivers, potentially leading them to believe that some screen time is safe or even beneficial, thereby exacerbating developmental delays and isolating behaviors.<\/p>\n
Rafe Clayton, a senior lecturer at the University of Leeds and co-lead of the research, stated that parents, often without clear guidance on their own digital habits, may be inadvertently teaching children unhealthy relationships with screen devices. Carmen Clayton, professor at Leeds Trinity University and another co-lead, added that governments need to improve engagement with families on problematic screen use, being sensitive to the fears parents may have about judgment.<\/p>\n
Andrea Leadsom, former Conservative minister and founder of the 1,001 Critical Days Foundation, called the review a “wake-up call,” noting the growing evidence of limited benefits and significant risks of screens during the crucial first 1,001 days of development. She suggested that responsibility should not fall solely on parents and that families need access to support through hubs like “Best Start.” Leadsom also indicated that technology companies should refrain from promoting content as suitable for babies when evidence suggests otherwise.<\/p>\n
Rachel de Souza, children’s commissioner for England, who was involved in drafting the government guidance, reiterated that the recommendation to avoid screen time for under-twos is clear. She acknowledged that the guidance aimed to support parental judgment and accommodate realities like video-calling relatives or supported learning, which are considered normal in limited circumstances.<\/p>\n
A Department for Education spokesperson defended their guidance as a first-of-its-kind resource for parents of under-fives, providing trusted support on a challenging issue.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
A comprehensive review suggests screen time for infants under two may lead to developmental concerns and recommends avoiding intentional use, citing risks to bonding, language, and physical play.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":2305,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4],"tags":[1895,2392,2393,1882,2391],"yoast_head":"\n